🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."